ON VIOLENCE

We have honoured violence long enough - Violence in the form of murder, in the form injustice and in our own selves. Damage to the fundamental rights of any fellow human is violence; in fact harm to the survival of any other being is violence. Thus for one’s survival violence, even in the most subtle form is necessary. Humans, at the top of the food chain are easily the most violent beings on the planet. Moreover, the urban humans who consume processed goods are the most violent of all. Establishing this point it is easy to say that anyone who reads this cannot escape the blame of being violent atleast once a day. Because when you eat a meal, you are being violent to the organisms you consume (unless you know how to photosynthesise food).

So, we may say it is very natural to be violent, if we have to survive. However, if we take in the sense of ‘violence’ created by murder, rape and corruption can we justify them by using the excuse of ‘violence is natural for survival’? Yes, we can.

We can justify mass bombings killing hundreds of people in a city, to stop riots that killed thousand. We can justify death of innocent commuters in the name of God. We can justify the exile of lakhs of people in the name of community. Heck! We can even justify the violence of a bribe in the name of ‘lack of time to be honest’. However justification always needs a base ground of morals and rules that help the judge of any event take a perspective, form a point of view and give a decision. Thus justification of an event may be justifiable only with supportive points of view, but perspectives opposing to that act or event will not necessarily hold the justification valid. Like how, the Court of one nation will not necessary uphold the decision of another nation’s Court due to the difference of constitutions and laws.

Thus acts of terrorism, bombings and war may be justified as violence for survival to uphold religious ideals, patriotism and even economy but cannot be justified in the plain sense of the survival of humanity.

I, in this time of mixed goals and confused ideals, take a stand against violence and dare to judge all kind of violence among humans wrong. Violence is against the survival of the humankind. It is against evolution. All ideals of real progress urge people to be less and less violent. Honesty urges us to be non-violent in our words and actions of truth, success urges us to be non-violent by not being lazy at work, and conservation of the environment requires us to be non-violent in our usage of resources. Most of the time, the easy way out is also a violent way out.

And to those who say that violence is only natural; let me tell them that the tonsils are also only natural. But we evolved and don’t use them any more.

Comments ():

Your two posts are quite contradictory. ))) Grown up in a city I use to consume meat without thinking how it is processed or get. Once being twelve years old my family made a visit to relatives in a village and to prepare a dinner for us my grandmother decided to cook a chicken...I didn't realize it would be a life chicken that would be killed. I was shocked and didn't it that time. I thought it was cruel and we are to blame, because they tried to please us.
I thought I would never do it myself, but continue to eat meat afterwards. Not seeing the truth of some action doesn't mean we are better humans that somebody who has to kill to get food. This is natural violence based on the survival instincs and there is nothing wrong with it.
Hurting other human or living being purpousely and getting pleasure from it it completely another type of violence and I'm against it as well. I could understand hunting, fishing or something of that kind, but I would never understand torturing or raping human or animal.

I agree with you. We have choice. It is up to us to live in a violent or non-violent way. I choose peace and harmony.

Reply | Replies (1) added 

Thumbs Up, Marina!
Harmony rules! :)

Reply | Replies (0) added 

No, no, I do not think that meat is wrong to eat. I am non-vegetarian too... Only what I think is that non-vegetarianism is unnecessary in today's world. Thoughts of non-violence stated above have a flavour of Gandhism, who refused to eat meat. Moreover he went vegan. I am still at conflict on which side I lie... And violence through non-vegetarianism is very subtle and idealistic for us to digest. :-)

Reply | Replies (0) added 

I respect your point of view, Zaheenkb. I agree with you many people became victims of violence. However, considering eating meal as a violent action - it's too much for me!
Just a simple question: What if everyone stopped eating, what would we got then?
The violence would be stopped maybe because nobody would be living , so no one could make the violent actions!

Reply | Replies (0) added 

Hmmmmm.... (that's an intentionally long hmm)
I think that violence is a natural tendency... in the animal world it is a requirement. But I don't believe because it is a natural tendency that it's right. Humans are emotional creatures and do things, including violent acts, that are based on emotion... as opposed to necessity. But those same emotions also make us want to control and suppress those tendencies in ourselves as well as others. We are the most un-orderly species on the planet. Much of what we might have once done by instinct has been suppressed (much like our need for tonsils). As a species, we have intellect, but our primal drives have evolved less than half a step beyond the state we were in when we decided to stand up on walk on two feet.

As far as those who don't eat meat because they don't want to condone violence against animals.... that's a different ball of wax... Plants respond to outside stimulus too. It has been documented that some kinds of music encourages plants to grow and respond. And a plant is alive, it is a different form of life certainly... who's to say that just because you can't detect the reaction of an apple when you pick from the tree, that there isn't one. Shall we oppose animals from eating other animals because it's mean? Humans are omnivores. We have the teeth and digestive system that supports that. If were biological designed as vegetarians or vegans, those who eat such wouldn't need to supplement their diets to make sure they get protein etc. from other sources.

I do believe that animals that are sacrificed for our consumption should be done so humanely as possible and not in wasteful excess.



Reply | Replies (0) added 

Hi Zaheen, interesting article. However this is a world of relativity and I would prefer not to use absolutes such as "always wrong", "never right" etc. About food, I must confess I was a total vegetarian from birth until age 23 when I decided to chose to eat what is convenient! My philosophy is simple - I trust the Creator's wisdom. I cannot expect an Eskimo to be a vegetarian (now perhaps with cargo planes it may be possible to import veggies). So an Eskimo is not a 'sinner' if he is a non-vegetarian! The only caveat I would suggest is to be as humane as possible if you have to kill animals for food!

Regarding violence to humans, I believe in self-defence and defence of my family - so I will have no compunction if I have to injure of even kill another who is threatening my life or my family's life!

Reply | Replies (0) added 

@Gopi: True I too do not believe in vegetarianism as the correct mode. Neither do I practice it, nor propagate it. I only think it too be better than non-vegetarianism, and as an evolutionary goal. But maybe I'm wrong. And I'm happy with that. I agree to the absence of defined rights and wrongs and prefer to live in doubt... Maybe this will explain me better... http://www.educopark.com/Lessons/View/RIGHT-AND-RONG

Reply | Replies (0) added 

hi, I think this discussion is going to be very long .What I realize is that God has given us brain to distinguish between the different intake whether it is veg and non veg .Earlier there was no concept of grains and vegetables ,so people use to eat meat or fish but now we have plenty of options as supplement other than non veg food and we can survive more easily and healthy today....eventually It is up to you that what food you choose to consume.

Reply | Replies (0) added